en | hu | ru | bg | ro | tr FacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInYouTubeInstagram
+ 357-24-636-919
+ 44-20-7556-0900
NEWS

Sign up for a free consultation
Subscribe to our newsletter
Request a return call
Downloadable brochures
Request a brochure
Newsletters
5 Minutes Offshore
Why LAVECO?
How to order a company from LAVECO Ltd
Latest news
Currency exchange rates: USD/1 unit
2017.07.21
HUF 0.0038
GBP 1.2946
CHF 1.0404
RUB 0.0169
HKD 0.128
JPY 0.0089
CNY 0.1477
CAD 0.7928
AUD 0.7915
BRL 0.3176
EUR 1.1485

NEWS

UNCTAD Makes Offshore Recommendations


02/07/2013

The number of countries offering favorable tax conditions for special purpose entities (SPEs) is increasing, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) has said, urging that global efforts to tackle tax evasion be refocused.

According to a new UNCTAD report, "Global Value Chains: Investment and Trade for Development," the so-called "tax haven" economies now account for a growing share of global foreign direct investment (FDI) flows. It calculates that this figure now stands at around 6 percent.

While investment in offshore financial centers (OFCs) remains at record levels, SPEs now act as a channel for more than USD600bn of investment flows. As the report explains, "the decision to locate investments in economies that host SPEs is driven by the tax treatment of SPEs and also by double-taxation treaties."

Yet, as the UNCTAD points out, international efforts to combat tax evasion have concentrated largely on OFCs. SPEs, on the other hand, "are a far larger phenomenon." Cracking down on OFCs alone "is clearly not enough," and the report recommends that a closed list of "benign" uses of SPEs and OFCs be created as the starting point for a wider strategy rethink. Data on SPE transactions is nonetheless thin on the ground, and further research will be needed to improve transparency on the issue.

Looking at the still broader picture, the UNCTAD is clear that cracking down on tax avoidance through OFCs and SPEs "must go hand in hand with a discussion of corporate tax rate differentials between countries, the application of extraterritorial regimes, and the utility of triggering tax liabilities upon repatriation of earnings." Parallel action on these fronts is required, if governments hope to avoid "swimming against the tide."

www.taxnews.com

Top